From your comments you would clearly like a faster processer at a higher price point.
PVR performance is split between the PVR chipset which gives the PVR performance with multiple recordings, encryption/decryption and other chipset functions and U.I. performance which relies on the U.I. design and CPU speed.
All manufactures (excepting perhaps Apple) consider selling price as a important consideration.
I don’t think their choice can be right for all.
I write software for a living and there are two approaches to this:
1. You write software and ensure the hardware is appropriate to run it
2. You start with a fixed hardware set and write software in such a way so that it runs well on said hardware
I think you’re probably right in that they are keeping costs down by limiting the hardware. In which case they have failed in point 2 above.
It does seem like sightly bloated software to me. A more responsive basic text based interface would’ve been preferable for me
I beg to differ. If Barry is benefitting from Humax then its in his interest to tow the party line rather than be honest about the products failings.
Read Barry’s reviews of the YouView boxes, you cannot say he is restrained in any way.
The FVP 4000/5000T is somewhat slow and the supplied remote is decidally weedy. A Harmony remote is much better. And you can create single key forward/reverse skip keys. Not tried the info sequence, might have a go tomorrow.