Download quality

Forum Forums Freeview HD Aura UHD Download quality

Viewing 14 posts - 1 through 14 (of 14 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #21484
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Is it possible to improve the quality of downloaded video from the Humax Aura?

    An hour of SD TV is about 1.1GB – downloaded this is just over 0.5GB. This is not good enough.

    Is the App (if it ever appears) likely to offer a choice of quality download?

    #101451
    grahamlthompson
    Participant

    GordyBoy – 10 hours ago  » 

    Is it possible to improve the quality of downloaded video from the Humax Aura?

    An hour of SD TV is about 1.1GB – downloaded this is just over 0.5GB. This is not good enough.

    Is the App (if it ever appears) likely to offer a choice of quality download?

    Downloaded content is 720 x 576 SD quality. If I remember correctly the Video is compressed using H264 AVC. As this is a lot more efficient the lower bitrate should not have the impact on quality you imagine. I will download a file and check.

    The Freeview Play spec does not allow HD quality to be exported. If you really need this you would have to use on of the Enigma 2 Linux based pvrs.

    #101452
    grahamlthompson
    Participant

    The Content is reduced in size compared to a SD channel in a number of ways.

    1 The video is compressed using H264 AVC as used on HD channels. This allows a much lower bitrate. eg the BBC uses bitrates as low as 7000kbps. That’s the sort of bitrate the best SD channels used about a decade ago. SD channels use mpeg2 video compression

    2 It uses variable bitrate. The bitrate is adjusted dynamically according to the amount of movement. This also reduces the final file size

    3 SD channels use mpeg1 layer 2 audio compression. This is is replaced by the superior AAC (advanced audio codec).

    4 Footage is deinterlaced to create 720p25. SD broadcast is 720i50

    Complete analysis

    General

    ID : 0 (0x0)

    Complete name : D:DownloadsAntiques Road Trip.ts

    Format : MPEG-TS

    File size : 753 MiB

    Duration : 44 min 41 s

    Overall bit rate mode : Variable

    Overall bit rate : 2 356 kb/s

    Video

    ID : 100 (0x64)

    Menu ID : 1 (0x1)

    Format : AVC

    Format/Info : Advanced Video Codec

    Format profile : High@L4

    Format settings, CABAC : Yes

    Format settings, RefFrames : 2 frames

    Frame mode : Frame doubling

    Format settings, GOP : M=1, N=30

    Codec ID : 27

    Duration : 44 min 39 s

    Width : 720 pixels

    Height : 576 pixels

    Display aspect ratio : 16:9

    Frame rate : 25.000 FPS

    Standard : PAL

    Color space : YUV

    Chroma subsampling : 4:2:0

    Bit depth : 8 bits

    Scan type : Progressive

    Audio

    ID : 200 (0xC8)

    Menu ID : 1 (0x1)

    Format : AAC

    Format/Info : Advanced Audio Codec

    Format version : Version 2

    Format profile : LC

    Muxing mode : ADTS

    Codec ID : 15

    Duration : 44 min 38 s

    Bit rate mode : Variable

    Channel(s) : 2 channels

    Channel positions : Front: L R

    Sampling rate : 48.0 kHz

    Frame rate : 46.875 FPS (1024 SPF)

    Compression mode : Lossy

    #101453
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Surely it isn’t the file size that counts, it’s what it looks like.

    Does the downloaded content look worse than an SD recording when played back on the same device? If not, who cares if this is done with a lower file size than the broadcast stream would imply?

    #101454
    grahamlthompson
    Participant

    larkim – 1 hour ago  » 

    Surely it isn’t the file size that counts, it’s what it looks like.

    Does the downloaded content look worse than an SD recording when played back on the same device? If not, who cares if this is done with a lower file size than the broadcast stream would imply?

    The capability is designed to allow viewing using a offline device like a phone or a tablet when no WiFi is available. As clearly it won’t be a large 4K oled display the quality is OK. I will take a photo of playback on my Samsung tablet.

    #101455
    grahamlthompson
    Participant

    Downloaded SD From the Aura

    [attachment=84406,1646]

    #101456
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    It would have been nice if a choice of download quality could be offered.

    Could this be made possible with a future software update or is there more to it than this?

    #101457
    grahamlthompson
    Participant

    GordyBoy – 10 mins ago  » 

    It would have been nice if a choice of download quality could be offered.

    Could this be made possible with a future software update or is there more to it than this?

    If you are hoping for a Full-HD 1920 x 1080 it will not happen. This is only possible on older Humax units that have custom firmware add ons. Although we have not yet got the Aura app. The files you will get are the same as using the box built in Web interface.

    There are boxes out there that can do what you want. They are more expensive and nowhere near as user friendly

    #101458
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    The limitation on streaming only in SD does feel odd to me after the EE TV box streamed both live and recorded HD recordings to iPads / Android Phones etc. I fully understand this is part of the spec required by Freeview, so it’s just odd that I’ve had a device for a few years that did allow for it.

    I don’t think the EE TV box was doing conversion on the fly, and it was certainly re-broadcasting the HD channels live (e.g. you could tell it was the HD channel as you’d just see the ident screen etc when the regional news was on for example), accepting that it could have been doing some SD down-conversion that was invisible to the user when it was playing back recordings. The EE box did allow for download of episodes, but only within it’s fairly tight app, so if a programme was downloaded it wouldn’t have been available for transfer to another device, which I can see owuld be a legitimate fear for an HD broadcast recording given the way the Humax allows for users to access recordings etc.

    I only occasionally used the live re-broadcast functionality, but it was nice to have from time to time – I presume when the app comes live this won’t be available for HD channels?

    #101459
    grahamlthompson
    Participant

    larkim – 31 mins ago  » 

    The limitation on streaming only in SD does feel odd to me after the EE TV box streamed both live and recorded HD recordings to iPads / Android Phones etc. I fully understand this is part of the spec required by Freeview, so it’s just odd that I’ve had a device for a few years that did allow for it.

    I don’t think the EE TV box was doing conversion on the fly, and it was certainly re-broadcasting the HD channels live (e.g. you could tell it was the HD channel as you’d just see the ident screen etc when the regional news was on for example), accepting that it could have been doing some SD down-conversion that was invisible to the user when it was playing back recordings. The EE box did allow for download of episodes, but only within it’s fairly tight app, so if a programme was downloaded it wouldn’t have been available for transfer to another device, which I can see owuld be a legitimate fear for an HD broadcast recording given the way the Humax allows for users to access recordings etc.

    I only occasionally used the live re-broadcast functionality, but it was nice to have from time to time – I presume when the app comes live this won’t be available for HD channels?

    Not sure but in theory HD channel viewing should be allowable. I have another make Android TV box that I can watch live HD channels in HD on a Samsung tablet.

    If you download recordings for off air viewing then just like the Aura they are reduced to the same quality as the Aura ones. I can also watch LIVE HD TV on my Full-HD laptop in full-HD. Kodi comes with TV gateway pvr driver built in.

    #101460
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Just had a play with local streaming of a live HD channel into a PC browser, worked fine but the “Transcoder state” page of the boxes web-interface showed that 1 transcoder was in use, so I presume it is rendering on the fly to distribute the picture. I presume that means it ends up being non-HD, but for the use-cases I’m thinking of (keeping half an eye on a sporting event whilst cooking tea, watching the news etc) I doubt that would be an issue anyway. Will be interesting to see what the quality looks like when it is deliverd via an app interface.

    Two browser windows could simultaneously stream but a third couldn’t start the transcoder, so I guess that would be a limitation with devices around the house.

    Not likely to be an issue in practice though.

    #101461
    grahamlthompson
    Participant

    larkim – 6 hours ago  » 

    Just had a play with local streaming of a live HD channel into a PC browser, worked fine but the “Transcoder state” page of the boxes web-interface showed that 1 transcoder was in use, so I presume it is rendering on the fly to distribute the picture. I presume that means it ends up being non-HD, but for the use-cases I’m thinking of (keeping half an eye on a sporting event whilst cooking tea, watching the news etc) I doubt that would be an issue anyway. Will be interesting to see what the quality looks like when it is deliverd via an app interface.

    Two browser windows could simultaneously stream but a third couldn’t start the transcoder, so I guess that would be a limitation with devices around the house.

    Not likely to be an issue in practice though.

    Easy to check, No way to suggest so far to imagine the quality you get from downloading content from the the built in Webif will be improved.

    Only way would seem to be to increase the bitrate used for the conversion.

    That of course would inflate the file size and the time required to create the SD file.

    #101462
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    grahamlthompson – 1 hour ago  » 

    larkim – 6 hours ago  » 

    Just had a play with local streaming of a live HD channel into a PC browser, worked fine but the “Transcoder state” page of the boxes web-interface showed that 1 transcoder was in use, so I presume it is rendering on the fly to distribute the picture. I presume that means it ends up being non-HD, but for the use-cases I’m thinking of (keeping half an eye on a sporting event whilst cooking tea, watching the news etc) I doubt that would be an issue anyway. Will be interesting to see what the quality looks like when it is deliverd via an app interface.

    Two browser windows could simultaneously stream but a third couldn’t start the transcoder, so I guess that would be a limitation with devices around the house.

    Not likely to be an issue in practice though.

    Easy to check, No way to suggest so far to imagine the quality you get from downloading content from the the built in Webif will be improved.

    Only way would seem to be to increase the bitrate used for the conversion.

    That of course would inflate the file size and the time required to create the SD file.

    The Aura is slow to transcribe and then download a relatively small file. My FVP4000t can download the same SD programme far quicker and is a much larger file size.

    Aura 1 hour SD download is about 500MB – FVP 4000t download of the same file is about 1GB plus and is a lot quicker but still a good few minutes.

    #101463
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Could the bitrate of a download from the Aura be improved by Humax in a software update or is it more complicated than that?

Viewing 14 posts - 1 through 14 (of 14 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

The inner genius!