Replacement for 9300t

Forum Forums Miscellaneous Other Humax Products Replacement for 9300t

Tagged: ,

  • This topic has 9 replies, 4 voices, and was last updated 5 years ago by Anonymous.
Viewing 10 posts - 1 through 10 (of 10 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #21309
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Having been pleased with my 9300t for some years I would like to replace it with a PVR capable of receiving HD Freeview.

    Can anyone recommend which model would be the nearest in terms of simplicity of operation and clear EPG etc? I do not require internet capability.

    #99889
    Martin Liddle
    Participant

    rodfryatt – 9 hours ago  » 

    Having been pleased with my 9300t for some years I would like to replace it with a PVR capable of receiving HD Freeview.

    Can anyone recommend which model would be the nearest in terms of simplicity of operation and clear EPG etc? I do not require internet capability.

    If you want to stay with Humax then an HDR-2000T might fit the bill. If you want to look further afield then a Manhattan T3-R would be worth considering.

    #99890
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    I get the impression that generally there are far fewer noisy Humax HDR-1800T units (those with a 320GB drive) compared to HDR-2000T units these days. As they run the same software an HDR-1800T may be a safer bet over an HDR-2000T.

    The Manhattan T2-R does not have Freeview Play, or catch-up, capability which the T3-R has, but is otherwise very similar to the T3-R apart from being noticeably cheaper.

    For the clarity of the EPG it does very much depend on the individual. Images of both can be found on the internet.

    #99891
    Martin Liddle
    Participant

    Luke – 49 mins ago  » 

    I get the impression that generally there are far fewer noisy Humax HDR-1800T units (those with a 320GB drive) compared to HDR-2000T units these days. As they run the same software an HDR-1800T may be a safer bet over an HDR-2000T.

    Fair point Luke. We have an early HDR-2000T which is reasonably quiet but I understand that at some point in the production Humax changed the hard drive mounting which is probably responsible for the complaints. The HDR-1800T uses a smaller 2.5″ hard drive (as opposed to the 3.5″ drive in the 2000T) which may also help.

    The Manhattan T2-R does not have Freeview Play, or catch-up, capability which the T3-R has, but is otherwise very similar to the T3-R apart from being noticeably cheaper.

    Another interesting point. What I like about the T3-R is that Manhattan are reportedly actively updating the software to add features. I don’t know if this true of the T2-R?

    #99892
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    I think what I would really like is another Humax that is as near as possible to my 9300t but able to receive HD. I have tried a FVP-400t and found it a disaster.

    I have no need of a machine that uses the internet.

    #99893
    Martin Liddle
    Participant

    rodfryatt – 3 hours ago  » 

    I think what I would really like is another Humax that is as near as possible to my 9300t but able to receive HD. I have tried a FVP-400t and found it a disaster.

    So a Humax HDR-2000T or HDR-1800T would fit the requirement. If you are not interested in them could you tell us why please?

    #99894
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Thanks for the advice chaps and I will certainly be heeding it now you have pointed me in the right direction. What I meant was, I have no need of internet capabilty on a replacement PVR. I have a PC for that.

    With technology I always buy second-hand slightly out-of date gear at a fraction of the original price and don’t really want to pay more for a box with a service that I will not be using.

    However, if the only decent HD PVR’s now all have this ability, so be it, I will just have to buy one.

    #99895
    Martin Liddle
    Participant

    rodfryatt – 4 hours ago  » 

    However, if the only decent HD PVR’s now all have this ability, so be it, I will just have to buy one.

    The HDR-2000T/HDR-1800T only had minimal internet capability (iPlayer and I am not sure if that is working currently). Later models have a much wider range of players.

    #99896
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    rodfryatt – 5 hours ago  » 

    Thanks for the advice chaps and I will certainly be heeding it now you have pointed me in the right direction. What I meant was, I have no need of internet capabilty on a replacement PVR. I have a PC for that.

    With technology I always buy second-hand slightly out-of date gear at a fraction of the original price and don’t really want to pay more for a box with a service that I will not be using.

    However, if the only decent HD PVR’s now all have this ability, so be it, I will just have to buy one.

    You could try the DMR-HWT130, £169.99 from Panasonic. Been out a few years and not so nice to use as the 9300 but rock solid reliable.

    #99897
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    I see that Panasonic has no audio outlet sockets so no use to me. Settled for a HDR-1800T at a very reasonable price. Being used to the earlier Humax I’m sure that will do.

Viewing 10 posts - 1 through 10 (of 10 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

The inner genius!