Forum › Forums › Miscellaneous › Other Humax Products › Replacement for 9300t
- This topic has 9 replies, 4 voices, and was last updated 5 years ago by
Anonymous.
-
AuthorPosts
-
November 18, 2020 at 2:11 pm #21309
Anonymous
InactiveHaving been pleased with my 9300t for some years I would like to replace it with a PVR capable of receiving HD Freeview.
Can anyone recommend which model would be the nearest in terms of simplicity of operation and clear EPG etc? I do not require internet capability.
November 19, 2020 at 12:13 am #99889Martin Liddle
Participantrodfryatt – 9 hours ago »
Having been pleased with my 9300t for some years I would like to replace it with a PVR capable of receiving HD Freeview.
Can anyone recommend which model would be the nearest in terms of simplicity of operation and clear EPG etc? I do not require internet capability.
If you want to stay with Humax then an HDR-2000T might fit the bill. If you want to look further afield then a Manhattan T3-R would be worth considering.
November 19, 2020 at 10:14 am #99890Anonymous
InactiveI get the impression that generally there are far fewer noisy Humax HDR-1800T units (those with a 320GB drive) compared to HDR-2000T units these days. As they run the same software an HDR-1800T may be a safer bet over an HDR-2000T.
The Manhattan T2-R does not have Freeview Play, or catch-up, capability which the T3-R has, but is otherwise very similar to the T3-R apart from being noticeably cheaper.
For the clarity of the EPG it does very much depend on the individual. Images of both can be found on the internet.
November 19, 2020 at 11:11 am #99891Martin Liddle
ParticipantLuke – 49 mins ago »
I get the impression that generally there are far fewer noisy Humax HDR-1800T units (those with a 320GB drive) compared to HDR-2000T units these days. As they run the same software an HDR-1800T may be a safer bet over an HDR-2000T.
Fair point Luke. We have an early HDR-2000T which is reasonably quiet but I understand that at some point in the production Humax changed the hard drive mounting which is probably responsible for the complaints. The HDR-1800T uses a smaller 2.5″ hard drive (as opposed to the 3.5″ drive in the 2000T) which may also help.
The Manhattan T2-R does not have Freeview Play, or catch-up, capability which the T3-R has, but is otherwise very similar to the T3-R apart from being noticeably cheaper.
Another interesting point. What I like about the T3-R is that Manhattan are reportedly actively updating the software to add features. I don’t know if this true of the T2-R?
November 19, 2020 at 9:41 pm #99892Anonymous
InactiveI think what I would really like is another Humax that is as near as possible to my 9300t but able to receive HD. I have tried a FVP-400t and found it a disaster.
I have no need of a machine that uses the internet.
November 20, 2020 at 1:28 am #99893Martin Liddle
Participantrodfryatt – 3 hours ago »
I think what I would really like is another Humax that is as near as possible to my 9300t but able to receive HD. I have tried a FVP-400t and found it a disaster.
So a Humax HDR-2000T or HDR-1800T would fit the requirement. If you are not interested in them could you tell us why please?
November 20, 2020 at 11:31 am #99894Anonymous
InactiveThanks for the advice chaps and I will certainly be heeding it now you have pointed me in the right direction. What I meant was, I have no need of internet capabilty on a replacement PVR. I have a PC for that.
With technology I always buy second-hand slightly out-of date gear at a fraction of the original price and don’t really want to pay more for a box with a service that I will not be using.
However, if the only decent HD PVR’s now all have this ability, so be it, I will just have to buy one.
November 20, 2020 at 4:07 pm #99895Martin Liddle
Participantrodfryatt – 4 hours ago »
However, if the only decent HD PVR’s now all have this ability, so be it, I will just have to buy one.
The HDR-2000T/HDR-1800T only had minimal internet capability (iPlayer and I am not sure if that is working currently). Later models have a much wider range of players.
November 20, 2020 at 5:31 pm #99896Anonymous
Inactiverodfryatt – 5 hours ago »
Thanks for the advice chaps and I will certainly be heeding it now you have pointed me in the right direction. What I meant was, I have no need of internet capabilty on a replacement PVR. I have a PC for that.
With technology I always buy second-hand slightly out-of date gear at a fraction of the original price and don’t really want to pay more for a box with a service that I will not be using.
However, if the only decent HD PVR’s now all have this ability, so be it, I will just have to buy one.
You could try the DMR-HWT130, £169.99 from Panasonic. Been out a few years and not so nice to use as the 9300 but rock solid reliable.
November 21, 2020 at 10:51 pm #99897Anonymous
InactiveI see that Panasonic has no audio outlet sockets so no use to me. Settled for a HDR-1800T at a very reasonable price. Being used to the earlier Humax I’m sure that will do.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.