Forum › Forums › Freeview HD › HDR 1800T, 2000T › Loop through update?
Tagged: 2000T, firmware, loop through, updates
- This topic has 69 replies, 18 voices, and was last updated 11 years, 1 month ago by
Anonymous.
-
AuthorPosts
-
August 5, 2014 at 6:31 pm #52801
Anonymous
InactiveJust so I know when the update is eventually released, if you use the ‘Automatic Update’ facility on the HDR 2000T, does it only search for OTA updates or does it also look for updates available via the web (assuming you have an internet connection)?
I hope it is the latter but fear it may only be the former!
August 5, 2014 at 7:27 pm #52802Anonymous
InactiveWhile I don’t know about Humax’s procedures – it would be normal for software “signed off for release” to be released for Manufacturing ASAP while the distribution for the higher cost and more error prone route to wait for, dare I say it, a more “appropriate” time, which may be soon or not.
This recognises there are support complications with each release and it’s application.
However I do wish Humax would again make available such “releases” on one of their websites.
August 5, 2014 at 8:57 pm #52804Anonymous
InactiveIndeed. OTA updates have costs associated with them, but a web site release does not (or at least minimal in comparison). It’s a great shame Humax have stopped doing web site releases for update over USB. Not only are they more timely than over the air, I find USB updates a lot my convenient. Over the air takes hours, compared to a couple of minutes by USB.
August 5, 2014 at 8:59 pm #52805Anonymous
InactiveVictor Delta – 2 hours ago »
Just so I know when the update is eventually released, if you use the ‘Automatic Update’ facility on the HDR 2000T, does it only search for OTA updates or does it also look for updates available via the web (assuming you have an internet connection)?
As the HDR-FOX T2’s Automatic Update is only via the aerial when the update is being transmitted it is highly likely that the 2000T is the same especially when other similarities between the two models are taken into account.
Victor Delta – 2 hours ago »
I hope it is the latter but fear it may only be the former!
What is there to fear? Humax have an excellent track record of repeating broadcasts of released versions for many months and sometimes longer.
August 5, 2014 at 9:24 pm #52806Anonymous
InactiveHumax also have an excellent track record of taking nearly a year to issue a software update in the first place. It took about 4 months to get a BBC3/4 HD recording fix for the HDR Fox T2 after COM7 started broadcasting. We’re still waiting for that same software 1.03.12 for the HD Fox T2, about 8 months after the problem was first reported. We’ve been waiting nearly as long for the aerial pass through fix for the HDR 2000T.
I am starting to think the HDR Fox T2 and HD Fox T2 are the only Humax products I will ever buy. The newer models don’t have the features I want, and the software support started poor and has got much worse over time.
August 28, 2014 at 10:11 pm #52807Anonymous
InactiveDo we think this loop through update is ever going to happen now or is it simply rumour and the likes of Humax CS putting a positive spin on matters in an effort to prevent customer alienation?
Is it even technically feasible?
August 28, 2014 at 10:56 pm #52808Anonymous
InactiveFaust – 43 minutes ago »
Do we think this loop through update is ever going to happen now or is it simply rumour and the likes of Humax CS putting a positive spin on matters in an effort to prevent customer alienation?
Is it even technically feasible?
No one really knows. We will only ever have a clear answer if/when an update is delivered onto customer boxes. If it never appears then we will never really know, people have to decide for themselves when to give up waiting and assume it’s never going to appear.
August 28, 2014 at 11:37 pm #52809Martin Liddle
ParticipantFaust – 1 hour ago »
Is it even technically feasible?
Barry says it is technically feasible and has a pre-release version of the software working so personally I believe it is technically feasible. As for why Humax have chosen not to release it, I have no idea.
August 31, 2014 at 8:12 am #52810Anonymous
InactiveMartin Liddle – 2 days ago »
Faust – 1 hour ago »
Is it even technically feasible?
Barry says it is technically feasible and has a pre-release version of the software working so personally I believe it is technically feasible. As for why Humax have chosen not to release it, I have no idea.
Fortunately my trusty old Panasonic DVDR is still hanging in there so I don’t need to do anything currently. However, if the Panny does fail and this loop through issue hasn’t been addressed, then I will look elsewhere.
I’m not prepared to go down the route of trusting that it may/will be done.
August 31, 2014 at 10:32 am #52811Anonymous
InactiveI’ve been musing over buying a 2000T, but the loopthru problem has been putting me off.
What I find strange is that on visiting PCW to look at the unit, all their branches in my area only had the display unit in stock. Either the 2000T’s have been selling exceptionally well or do PCW know something the public dont know about the machine.
Maybe they are just keeping their inventory low,but who wants to buy display stock at full price!
August 31, 2014 at 4:47 pm #52812Anonymous
InactiveIt recently had another good review in Which?, which may explain the low stock levels.
September 23, 2014 at 10:26 am #52813Anonymous
InactiveIs this update ever going to happen or is it just vapourware? It is now 4 months since it was claimed that the solution had been engineered and was awaiting roll-out.
September 23, 2014 at 12:27 pm #52814Anonymous
InactiveSF54 – 1 hour ago »
Is this update ever going to happen or is it just vapourware? It is now 4 months since it was claimed that the solution had been engineered and was awaiting roll-out.
This is par for the course with Humax support. My approach is to assume there will never be any updates from Humax, and on the odd occasions when one does appear it’s a bonus. Base your buying decisions on the software that is in the field today, not on an update which might not ever appear.
September 23, 2014 at 3:11 pm #52815Anonymous
InactiveOwen Smith – 2 hours ago »
…Base your buying decisions on the software that is in the field today, not on an update which might not ever appear.
Yes agreed. This is definitely my position for any future Humax purchases, if any.
September 27, 2014 at 3:05 pm #52816Anonymous
InactiveI would second what Pollensa has to say. Whilst in the main they do make good PVR’s whatever is wrong to start with tends to stay that way.
I was looking to buy the 2000T as a new Freeview recording source. However, given the lack of loop through and promises of jam tomorrow I have now taken it off my list.
I suspect I will buy another Panasonic.
We were given assurances that the 1000s would be upgraded with DLNA server capabilities. However, 12 months on and it’s still just a client. That’s told me what I needed to know for future purchases.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.